As the IFIs step up investments in environmentally-controversial infrastructure projects, such as fossil-fuel generating extractive industries, and manage increasingly larger climate investment funds, Gender Action is addressing their gender impacts. Gender disparities in decision making, property rights, access to information, and unequal divisions of labor mean women bear the brunt of IFI financed climate change impacts. Droughts, floods and natural disasters leave women more vulnerable to livelihood loss, disease, violence and even death.
Our gender, international finance and climate change link provides resources on the gender impacts of IFI investments in sectors heavily impacted by climate change: such as agriculture, health, post-conflict and post-disaster reconstruction. The Link offers suggestions for improving gender justice in the face of climate change and 'dirty' IFI investments. The Link is not just a briefing; it is also a tool for cooperative action between international finance watchers, climate change and gender justice activists.
This new Guide to Women’s Rights and Environmental Justice Advocacy on International Financial Institutions is a joint Gender Action, Global Alliance for Green and Gender Action (GAGGA), and Both ENDS publication. The Guide is a tool for women’s rights and other groups’ advocacy on the IFIs to ensure IFIs uphold and do not undermine rights to clean water, food and a healthy and safe environment.
In this article Elaine Zuckerman explores harmful gender and environmental issues that likely mining activity in Haiti would generate. Women, who primarily steward Haiti’s land, forests, water and eco-systems that sustain their households could lose access to natural resources and livelihoods and suffer sexual violence triggered by potential mining. The Haiti Advocacy Working Group, which Gender Action co-founded in 2010, published by the article.
From Ignorance to Inclusion: Gender-Responsive Multilateral Adaptation Investments in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region
Gender Action and the Heinrich Böll Foundation's newly released report "From Ignorance to Inclusion: Gender-Responsive Multilateral Adaptation Investments in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region" exposes women's persistent marginalization from climate adaptation projects. Across the MENA region, where women already suffer from social and political exclusion, climate change is expected to further exacerbate existing gender inequalities. Despite this, our report finds that multilateral development investments, like those of the World Bank, have not prioritized gender-sensitivity in adaptation projects.
Based on in-depth gender analysis of all of the active multilateral climate change adaptation-related projects in the MENA region, the report finds that too often these investments view women as passive victims of climate change, ignoring their extensive expertise and agency in adaptation activities. This both compromises women's human rights and undermines the effectiveness of climate smart projects. The report recommends that multilateral investments integrate gender dimensions and promote women's involvement as leaders in climate change adaptation and environmental management. "Ignorance to Inclusion" reinforces Gender Action and the Heinrich Böll Foundation's efforts to promote women's full, consistent and meaningful participation in climate change investments.
Gender Impacts of the World Bank-Financed West-African and Chad-Cameroon Pipelines
Based on fieldwork done with Friends of the Earth member groups in Cameroon, Nigeria, Togo and Ghana, Broken Promises reveals that the Chad-Cameroon and West African pipelines, financed by the World Bank, increased women's poverty and dependence on men; caused ecological degradation that destroyed women's livelihoods; discriminated against women in employment and compensation; excluded women in consultation processes; and led to increased prostitution.
Governing Climate Funds:
What Will Work for Women?
As the international community mobilizes in response to global climate changes, climate change mechanisms must ensure the equitable and effective allocation of funds for the world's most vulnerable populations. Gender Action's new publication, Governing Climate Funds:
What Will Work for Women?, highlights women and girls' disproportionate vulnerability to negative climate change impacts in developing countries, and demonstrates how they have been largely excluded from climate change finance policies and programs. The report examines two climate funds and two non-climate funds in order to learn how gender can be better integrated in global climate finance mechanisms. We show that women and girls must not only be included in adaptive and mitigative activities, but also recognized and supported as agents of change who are essential to the success of climate change interventions.
the Damage: World Bank Climate Investment Funds Undermine
Climate and Gender Justice
Doubling the Damage, published with support from the Heinrich Boell Foundation,
explores the linkages between climate change, gender justice and the World Bank's new Climate
Investment Funds. The paper outlines how the new Funds entirely ignore gender considerations, thus
undermining gender justice and disproportionately harming poor women. Doubling forms the basis for
civil society advocacy urging CIFs to address gender issues and monitoring CIF implementation for
gender sensitivity in future.
Promises: Gender Scorecard of World Bank-managed Post-Tsunami
Reconstruction in Indonesia
assessed public funding to assist Tsunami victims, the majority of whom were
women. This report demonstrated the failure of the World Bank administered
Multi Donor Trust Fund (MDF) for Indonesia's tsunami and earthquake
reconstruction to systematically address gender concerns in the design of its
projects despite MDF promises to do so. GenderAction developed a scorecard
system to rate the integration of gender issues into the project design.
Ultimately, the overwhelming majority of MDF projects earned failing grades on
their scorecards. We concluded that the MDF and World Bank failed to fulfill their
promises to ensure that MDF projects address women's and gender concerns
despite ample opportunity to do so. Gender Action recommended that the MDF
improve their track record by enhancing the gender integration of existing MDF
projects and ensuring that subsequent projects address gender issues.
Big Oil’s Gender Impacts in Azerbaijan, Georgia, and
A Report by Gender Action and CEE Bankwatch Network, September
This report, jointly published by Gender Action and Central and Eastern European Bankwatch Network (CEE Bankwatch Network), found that IFI extractive industry projects increase prostitution, HIV/AIDS and human trafficking. Boom Time Blues received significant press and spurred the World Bank to create a webpage dedicated to Extractive Industries and Gender which calls for “the improvement of the impact of extractive industries on women.” Since historically Bank web pages do not translate into more gender-sensitive investments, Gender Action continues monitoring and advocacy to hold the Bank to its promises.